Prehistoric Alien Craft Debris Recovered and Analysed
[3] - An Extraterrestrial Megastructure Exploded in Orbit 788,000-years-ago
An enormous alien megastructure imbued with self-aware artificial intelligence orbits the earth.
Far below the human population sees this strange visitor from afar glinting high above the clouds in the day. Shining bright white as it reflects the sunlight at night.
Then, one fateful day the extraterrestrial interloper is seen to explode in a blinding flash.
Hundreds of thousands of years in our remote past a group of archaic hominins enter a barren clearing.
These primitive humans stumble upon something never seen before, a mysterious artefact of smooth black glass.
Not long after this encounter, they craft for themselves weapons and tools.
You could certainly be forgiven if you assumed I’m referring to scenes from popular science fiction films.
That first scenario fits perfectly with the movie Oblivion (2013) and the second offers a dead ringer for the seminal contact moment in 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968).
It might be surprising to hear this, but the events described above aren’t from any movie or book. I’m describing historical events. Well, more properly prehistorical events.
Suffice it to say that I am not going to ask you to just take my word for that statement. We will carefully sift the facts of this case and in doing so the roots of my conviction will become clear.
The Melted Mothership and a Rain of Glass
Let's just refresh our memories a little. We previously encountered the claim that an enormous extraterrestrial megastructure exploded in terrestrial orbit.
The Alcheringa artefact and those who encountered it claim that after the destruction melted crystalline material rained onto the earth. Here are the relevant quotes from Alcheringa When the First Ancestors were Created:
“It [the mothership] was built, in our terms, quite differently from what the earthling understands at this time. It was a crystalline body. It had a consciousness because of the crystal; a consciousness that had been imbued into it by its builders. It actually grew. Liquid crystal is used in many ways to make many things in the star peoples’ dimension.”
“In my memory, and many other people’s memory, the Mothership was stationed on the outer atmosphere of this planet earth. The ship was organic.”
“The explosion in my dream looked like a nuclear explosion – hotter than the sun, causing the Mothership to melt.”
“Are you aware if pieces of the mothership came to Earth?” “It sort of melted. There were pieces all around.”
If we are to take seriously the Alcheringa story at the heart of the Bostock-Barrow contact case, we must be able to find objective scientific support for this explosive claim.
We must locate material evidence that fits with an enormous crystalline artificial intelligence melting above our planet and showering molten glass debris.
Let’s be honest, that’s a tall order. We go into that one expecting to draw a blank.
Incredibly, we get one hit. Australasian tektite glass.
Before going deep here let me just overview why we should consider Australasian tektites a hit:
Composed primarily of silica from melted quartz crystal (>70%)
Formed at extremely high temperatures in a vacuum environment.
Secondary melting from entry into the atmosphere from space
Entry angles for tektites conducive with a parent body fragmenting in orbit
Chemical composition and isotopes fit an interstellar source.
Mixing and fining of glass indicated a glassy parent (artificiality)
A scientific puzzle yet unresolved by the academic community despite 200 years of investigation and experimentation.
Dating fits well with the timing for other related events/phenomena in the study.
There are hundreds of papers that relate to the study of Australasian tektites.
I don't expect you to read the large number of academic studies that I've explored. Indeed, one important question for me is to decide how much information is useful to share here.
There’s a difficult balance to be maintained. There’s a need to consider sufficient supporting evidence for the hypothesis, but without becoming bogged down in mountains of technical information.
I will do my best to keep that balance in mind, but please know there is a vast reservoir of additional knowledge available.
You might not be shocked to hear this revelation. No other scientific researchers suggest that Australasian tektites link to alien technology.
We aren’t in a scientific paradigm where aliens are explored as the possible answer to any question.
Anomalies that could be solved by invoking aliens remain unresolved by default.
Through the Looking Glass
We need to briefly look at the different types of glass to better understand where tektites fit in and why they are implicitly anomalous.
Glass can be produced either artificially or naturally.
Humans typically make glass by heating source materials in a crucible until the molten material is well mixed. Undesirable volatile elements are bubbled off. The molten mix is then rapidly cooled, or quenched.
Artificial glass is also sometimes formed by Explosives. You might know of trinitite glass formed by nuclear blasts.
Natural glasses can result from lightning impacts (fulgurite), volcanic processes (obsidian) and cosmic impact events (impact melt glass).
Let’s drill a little deeper into the types of glass not created by human activity.
Glass produced during lightning strikes or asteroid impacts both share a basic profile.
These two glass types form in a brief duration high-energy event. They are quite foamy, full of frozen bubbles. The glasses have a composition that's poorly mixed (heterogeneous). Partly melted and unmelted source materials (relics) persist.
These rapidly formed types of glass are almost identical to their source materials in terms of their chemistry.
Volcanic obsidians and tektites exhibit many commonalities.
These two types of glass form during more extended periods of heating. During the mixing process, bubbles escape the mix and carry off volatile elements and gasses (the fining process).
The chemical components become very well intermixed (homogenous). Notable changes in chemical composition and isotopic ratios may now differentiate the glass from its source materials.
A conundrum here is that tektites are commonly argued to be a rare type of asteroid impact glass.
However, as we've seen tektite characteristics are closer to volcanic glass than to melt materials found at known impact craters.
Tektite glass is homogenous, fined, free of relics and chemically distinct from surface rocks at their discovery sites. Totally unlike confirmed asteroid impact glasses.
The incoherence of tektites has led to a long-enduring mystery. Even today this scientific puzzle persists.
Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the required formation process. Two models offered the most parsimonious solutions. One is a lunar origin, and the second is a terrestrial asteroid impact.
These two proffered hypotheses can both potentially explain most of the observed evidence, but they still leave anomalies unresolved.
Lunar Origin
If tektites arrived from space already being fined and homogenous glass, no extended period of heating in the terrestrial environment is required.
This scenario could explain most of the observed characteristics. NASA scientists realised extraterrestrial volcanic activity could produce such a glass.
In decades past numerous NASA rocket engineers argued that an asteroid impact into lunar volcanoes likely ejected glass into space and towards the earth.
This lunar hypothesis remained popular until an analysis of moon rocks found their chemistry was not consistent with tektite composition.
The lunar hypothesis would also require relatively recent volcanism on the moon to match the age of tektite glass. The best evidence indicates the moon’s volcanic activity ceased around 50 million years ago.
An additional problem is that NY shower of glass fragments travelling from the moon towards the earth would be pulled apart by solar gravity. Any singular large chunk would shower only a small area of glass during earth entry.
The possibility of this glass arriving from deep space was briefly considered but rejected. Largely for the same reasons as the dismissal of a lunar source. Additionally, a source far beyond the moon should be indicated by a strong signature from cosmic ray bombardment.
The only well-established natural process for homogenous fined glass is volcanism.
Terrestrial Origin
For tektites to form in a terrestrial environment they would require a high-energy heating event with an extended duration.
Volcanic activity can be ruled out as tektites are distributed in clusters (strewnfields) that are larger than can be explainable by volcanic eruptions.
Again, the composition of tektites is significantly different from volcanic glass, including extremely low water content.
Most tektites are shaped by flight through the atmosphere, in some cases, they exhibit aerodynamic reshaping consistent with entry from space.
Most scientists today hypothesise that either an asteroid or comet collision with earth produced tektites.
The chemical composition of tektites is almost entirely consistent with sedimentary rocks. The impact site would require a combination of 41% shale, 2% sandstone, 20% greywacke, and 37% quartzite. The impact sites would also require the presence of pyroxenite, a rare class of minerals (a problematic addition).
It is conceivable that an asteroid's impact on a sufficiently grand scale could launch melted earth rock into space. Enabling aerodynamic reshaping for some tektites.
It is calculated that this cosmic ejection scenario happened following the Chicxulub impact event 65 million years ago.
The Chicxulub impactor was approximately 10km in diameter and the resulting crater was 180km across. The event caused a global cataclysm that left several geological and environmental signatures.
Therefore tektites with shaping from Atmospheric entry should be associated with enormous cratering events. Presently no impact crater has been identified in relation to these aerodynamic button-type tektites.
The mixing and fining of tektite glass are not readily explained by asteroid impact events. Glass found at cratering event sites across the planet is not tektite and does not share their characteristics.
Tektite glass has never been found at an impact crater or within immediate proximity. Tektites are found well beyond the understood maximum 400km range for distal ejecta with respect to any claimed impact sites.
Exotic solutions have been offered to resolve the persisting anomalies, but these hypotheses remain highly contested. Quite simply the novel explanations are given conflict with observational data.
Interstellar Origin
Tektite origin and production can be fully explained by arguing for an interstellar origin, leaving no persisting anomalies. However, there is little chance a large natural body would become a terrestrial satellite.
“for now we note that nobody sees how to account for the distribution if they arrive from interplanetary space somehow. A single chunk arriving from space is exceedingly unlikely to be trapped into a geocentric orbit; without this, distribution of the fragments seems impossible.”
- John A. O'Keefe & Paul Do Lowman, Jr., NASA - Goddard Space Flight Center (1965)
If a glassy object arrived from beyond our solar system the mixing and fining would have occurred previous to arrival. Whether naturally or artificially.
An object arriving from deep space that then underwent an extended heating event while in orbit would also match with the tektite mixing and fining.
We don’t know of any natural cosmic objects composed primarily of glassy material, or with the high levels of silica found in tektites (>70%).
If a natural object arrived from space that had this kind of glassy structure it would strongly indicate an interstellar origin. We would also be left looking for an unknown exotic process.
The alternative to an exotic natural body is an object that's deliberately manufactured.
In the scenario where a body arrived from deep space prior to an extended heating event, a question emerges.
What natural event could superheat the object in the cold of space for long enough to create homogenous fined glass?
“The upper limit to the amount of A12' found is such that tektites cannot have existed in space as individual bodies more than about 100,000 'years. They could have existed as a solid mass whose interior was protected against primary cosmic rays except that if such a mass were interplanetary there is no conceivable way by which it could be broken up and distributed over the strewnfields.”
- John A. O'Keefe & Paul Do Lowman, Jr., NASA - Goddard Space Flight Center (1965)
There is no known natural mechanism for this heating in space. We would be forced to consider an unnatural heating action.
This anomalous heating would indicate an unnatural event, assumedly intelligently controlled.
It is well established that in the case of Australasian tektite material the glass droplets initially formed in a vacuum, equivalent to space.
The molten droplets froze rapidly into solid spheres. Many of these spheres exhibit reshaping from secondary melting while entering the earth’s atmosphere.
This aerodynamic shaping is consistent with entry at very shallow angles, almost horizontal to the planet’s surface. Such gentle entry angles indicate a fragmenting terrestrial satellite as the parent body.
Extensive melted debris should rain down along the decaying orbital path of any large satellite until the termination point.
We would expect some larger pieces of partially melted debris to enter the atmosphere. These chunks would initiate aerial bursts and localised showering events.
All of the above fit precisely with observations made along the lengthy Australasian tektite strewnfield.
It's important to note that the negligible cosmic ray bombardment signature in these tektites is easily explained.
Any initially high levels of cosmic ray bombardment would be lost during the melting and mixing of the parent object. The true period of travel through space and interstellar origin would be obscured.
When did this all happen?
This dating is stated to be five times more accurate than any previous attempts. The same dating study concluded an absolute minimum temperature during the glass formation process. Indicating this temperature was between 2350°C - 3950 °C.
For a quick comparison, the surface of the sun is 5500°C. So whatever occurred involved heats greater than half that of our star.
Conclusion
You and I went looking for scientific evidence that can support the story of a huge crystalline alien craft superheated to a melting point in terrestrial orbit.
That supporting evidence clearly exists.
We sought confirmation of melted silica raining from space along a decaying orbital path.
Confirmation of that event is now ours.
The formation and distribution of Australasian tektites fit precisely with the narrative we are investigating.
Crucially, we now have a precise date for these events, 788,000 years before the present day. This gives us a date range for seeking out other events in the original source narrative.
I think the conviction that the story offered by the Alcheringa artefact is factual looks well founded. However, there is still a need to go deeper into the technical information around the Australasian tektite shower.
We certainly want to know if any larger parts of the parent object broke the atmosphere, potentially surviving entry. Imagine if a large section of an alien mothership went down somewhere carrying intact technology. Maybe even a hanger deck full of docked flying saucers.
Could alien technology persist to be uncovered in an archaeological expedition?
What if such technologies had already been excavated and covered up?
Going forward, we will look at additional elements that strengthen the links between our source information and the Australasian tektite data. We should seek to further solidify an interstellar origin for the Australasian Tektites’ parent body.
Finally, we will take seriously the potential for the discovery of active technology and where we might want to look.
This newsletter is made possible through the kind support of readers. Please consider signing up for a paid monthly subscription to help me dedicate more time to better serve this community. Please leave your feedback in the comments!
Very compelling info. Thanks!
Wow! Fascinating Bruce, thank you very much